I was probably what you would call a Messianic, believing in Yeshua/Jesus
So you rejected Jesus Messiah? That is rejecting your salvation. Didn't anyone teach you about that?
| Author | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1Norma |
|||
I was probably what you would call a Messianic, believing in Yeshua/Jesus So you rejected Jesus Messiah? That is rejecting your salvation. Didn't anyone teach you about that? |
|||
Zachary M |
|||
1Norma wrote:YHWH is my Creator, Redeemer and Savior as He has promised. I am merely following the path He is leading me on as you must be faithful to the path by which He leads you. Blessings |
|||
1Norma |
|||
YHWH is my Creator, Redeemer and Savior as He has promised. YHWH promised a Redeemer and a Savior why are you rejecting what He promised.
Last Edited By: 1Norma
04/12/09 17:54:41.
Edited 1 times.
|
|||
alwayseekin |
First ... | ||
|
Happy Easter everyone ... and Happy Passover and First Fruits too ;-)
Norma, where did he say he rejected Jesus as Messiah? Isn't that what "messianic's" believe ... that Jesus is the Savior the Jewish people expected? I am more interested in what Zack means by completing conversion ... do we not expect the Jewish people, and their converts, to believe in their Messiah sent by YHWH? Second ... I have to apologize for disappearing this last week. I was posting in what turned out to be a lull at work, but EVERYBODY seems to have waited until the last minute to file their taxes and I've been extremely busy LOL ... the little time I've had to post I've spent at BC [which, as it turns out is an interesting twist] Don't worry, I'll be back full force next week [glad I warned ya? hehe] Blessings, Michael |
|||
1Norma |
|||
|
Hi Michael
Did I misunderstand what Zack is saying here; I was probably what you would call a Messianic, believing in Yeshua/Jesus and also the wisdom and truth of Torah as life instruction. I have since fully returned to Judaism and completed conversion. That is why I do not post here very often anymore.I thought he was saying he is no longer a Messianic (Christain) and had now fully converted to Judaism. How can a one fully return to Judaism (under the Law covenant) and still believe Jesus is Messiah and the new covenant? If I missunderstood you, Zack, please let me know. God Bless |
|||
Zachary M |
|||
1Norma wrote:Hi Norma, Though we may word things slightly differently, I think your understanding is essentially correct. As far as Yeshua/Jesus is concerned, there is nothing there I feel need to accept or reject from my perspective. It is all about seeking to connect with the Father and placing all my trust in Him. Blessings, Zack |
|||
Brother Roger |
|||
Zachary M wrote:Hi Zack, Is the Judaism of today different that the Judaism of Jesus' day? If not, does it matter?
Brother Roger
|
|||
alwayseekin |
Nice one Brother Roger ;-) | ||
|
... and thank you Zack ;-)
To focus in on the question just a little tighter ... did/does "Judaism" [yesterday's or today's] automatically EXCLUDE Jesus as their Messiah and/or Savior? Does it have to be an either/or decision? ... Forget our general concepts of the issue, I'm asking about the heart of the matter Meaning ... can't one claim to practice [?? ... sorry for the lack of a better term] Judaism AND accept Christ Jesus? Didn't Peter & Paul and many many other first century Jews do just that? Blessings, Michael |
|||
Beloved |
I'm Actively Listening | ||
|
Hello All,
Just a note to say "I'm Actively Listening" and will be looking forward to Zachary's response(s). I might even ante my own few cents worth in the center of the dialogue table before it's over. Beloved |
|||
Zachary M |
|||
Brother Roger wrote: Hi Roger, Obviously, I wasn't there, so my knowledge is largely limited to my own rationalizations. However, I would guess that no religion remains stagnant over that many years, not Judaism, Christianity or others. For Judaism, I would say that while major core principles remain, many traditions have been added over the years and fences put up in effort to preserve Jews from blending in and losing their uniqueness as a people. And sorry, I'm not sure precisely what you're asking in the last part of that question. Blessings, Zack |
|||
Zachary M |
|||
alwayseekin wrote: Hi Michael, Judaism does exclude Yeshua/Jesus as their Messiah for various reasons. First, we really don't look to the need of another to die for our sins as Jews do not believe in the concept of original sin to begin with. Judaism also does not recognize anyone having come along that fulfilled the tasks the Messiah is said to accomplish. Another major reason is that Judaism does not allow that a man can be God. Having been on both sides of the fence now, I understand your question, as I asked the same thing a few years ago when I was a Messianic. Of course, anyone can 'claim' to practice anything. That doesn't mean they are accepted by that community. Jews generally do not believe the NT books are part of scripture, so anything said by Peter or Paul would be unimportant to them. Blessings, Zack |
|||
Biblepath |
|||
|
ouch. Ouch.
|
|||
Brother Roger |
|||
|
Zach -- I'm not sure precisely what you're asking in the last part of that question.
Roger -- I asked because I was listening to a lecture concerning God's promise to Israel and his future relationship with her in these end times. During the question/answer period someone in the audience asked whether the speaker could ever see himself converting to Judaism in order to participate in this promise etc. His answer was to say that he "didn't have a religious bone in his body", so no. However, he didn't think there was a modern version of "Judaism" that was close enough to the Judaism of Jesus day that we should think about joining up yet. He imagines that there will be someday, but not today. Anyway, I wanted to hear what you thought, seeing that you are living in that "neighborhood", so to speak. I've also heard from other sources that Modern Judaism isn't anything like the Judaism of Jesus' day. But then, I have also heard that there are four? major, distinctive forms of Judaism today. Just going off the top of my head I'm thinking: Orthodox, (what else?) I can't remember. Anyway, from my limited perspective I can see, perhaps, the seminal beginnings of a renewed, reinvigorated, more informed view of a Jewish movement back to God. I don't know what to call it, messianic Judaism? I don't know.
Brother Roger
|
|||
Zachary M |
|||
Brother Roger wrote: Ah, I see. Honestly, I have my own problems with Judaism today, but a few issues guided my decision. First was that, as I studied, I seemed to find that I have much in common with the core of Judaism's teachings. Second, I have always had a draw towards Israel that I cannot explain. Even through the first 40 essentially non-religious years of my life, I felt a connection everytime I heard or saw things related to Israel. I felt a connection to the people that was beyond description and being Jewish is in large part being a part of a people and community moreso than being an individual. I now believe strongly that there is something to what rabbi's call "having a Jewish soul". There are several variants of modern Judaism. Orthodoxy is the oldest and strictest. Also there is Conservative, Reform and Reconstructionist among the most common branches. Among the last 3 you can find some tremendous variance in practices from synagogue to synagogue. I hear some Reconstructionist Rabbi's and communities do not believe in God at all. I guess they may be secular Jews who just desire to gather socially? As far as the Judaism of Jesus' day, I believe Judaism today is as much different from that - as the Judaism of Jesus' day is from the days of Moses or King David. I believe the main tenants of the faith are preserved for the most part by tradition, but much also has been added or altered. In large part, I believe changes implemented are meant to preserve the Jewish people as a distinct and holy* people. Changes had to also be implemented in the first century simply to exist under Roman rule as later changes were needed to exist in the diaspora. * - Note the word translated "holy" in the Jewish culture simply means "separate". I mention this because many relate the word "holy" to being Godly or righteous in some manner. Blessings, Zack |
|||
Brother Roger |
Jesus is the messiah | ||
|
In your post to Micheal, at times you appeared to be speaking for Judaism and the Jews as a people and at other times you appeared to be speaking for yourself.
It was unclear whether you, personally, believe that Jesus is the messiah. You said that the three main objections Jews have to Jesus being a messiah were 1) A
man can't be God, 2) Jesus did not fulfill the prophecies, 3) Jews don't believe in original sin. Would you like to open up a dialog about any of these
here?
Brother Roger
|
|||
Zachary M |
|||
Brother Roger wrote: In case I did not answer that specifically, then the answer is no. I do not see Jesus or anyone else yet who has fulfilled the requirements to be Messiah. I am fine with discussing these subjects. My only reservation is that I don't want such discussions to cause contention. I already have quite a number of people from previous Messianic fellowship that no longer speak to me because of my conversion, which has saddened me greatly. Blessings Zack |
|||
Biblepath |
|||
|
Hello Zack,
I sort of got hung up on "ouch" for quite a while. Looks like most others did also. To a certain extent, of course, in explaining this - - - - what your statements bring to mind, is the thought - - - - "if he has left his first love" .... then - - - And the wet pillow hit the ground, with a soft splat..... - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- BUT - - - after listening to you, and reading, then re-reading this thread... .... Another thought comes to mind. BUT, of COURSE - - Jesus has not yet fulfilled all the messianic prophecies! He has not yet returned, as - - King of Kings! Yet we - - the Christians - - accept this as a "Given" that he WILL fulfill the rest of the prophecies. And we would agree, that - - he has not yet done this. And Paul says - - the Greeks seek after wisdom, but the Jews seek after a sign... . Interesting. .. .. .. .. My comment would be - - that - - you have not been watching quite the right things, else you would believe on Christ now... but - - if you can live a couple of decades more, you will then believe again, and probably weep. Nuff said for now. Later, Bert |
|||
Eugene210 |
|||
if you can live a couple of decades more, you will then believe again, and probably weep A "couple of decades" sounds like a safe thing to say. But considering that Hal Lindsey was making predictions in the mid-70's and Jack Van Impe's been doing it for decades ... I figured the Great Tribulation was imminent in the late 90's, but a decade has already passed. It does appear that the world is falling apart, but that's happened before while the decades kept rolling. Perhaps it's just that the world we know is falling apart, and the world in general will continue. |
|||
Linda marie |
Questions | ||
|
Hello Zachary,
I do not see Jesus or anyone else yet who has fulfilled the requirements to be Messiah.What 'requirements' are you looking for the Messiah to have? In other words, I assume you "are" looking for Messiah to come, so how will you recognise Him? If the same Yeshua [who lived on earth a couple of thousand years ago] * returns * delivers the Jewish people * gives them their homeland * rules on earth - would you accept Him? What if He also has nail scars in His hands and His feet? How did you interpret the prophetic Hebrew Scriptures when you were a Messanic, and how do you explain the same Scriptures now? Thanks, LindaMarie |
|||
Brother Roger |
|||
Zachary M wrote:Hi Zack, Please answer the others first, but when you get around to it, I was wondering if you had read any of the books on the "New Perspective" on Paul and if these influenced you at all? I haven't read them but I've seen a summary of this view and it seems to parallel some things you are saying.
Brother Roger
|
|||